The Best Women's Backpacking Backpacks
|Price||$269.95 at Amazon|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$249.95 at Amazon|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$259.95 at MooseJaw|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$209.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$220.00 at REI|
Compare at 3 sellers
|Pros||Very comfortable, slimmed-down waist-belt & suspension system, easy to remove top lid, wide range of fitting options and adjustments, good number of pockets||Super lightweight, large stow pockets, compression straps, lightweight material||Simple design, versatile, lightweight for the capacity, comfortable||Comfortable, lightweight, good set of features, large stow pockets||Comfortable, adjustable, works well with heavy loads, relatively inexpensive|
|Cons||Large waistband, suspension can feel bulky, expensive||Small overall capacity, very specialized, lacks versatility, expensive for size||Frame may not provide enough support for some||Simple suspension, lacks support||Lacks features, bulky waist belt|
|Bottom Line||This award-winning pack has stood the test year after year with its streamlined, lightweight design and incredibly ventilated and comfortable back panel.||This light, sleek pack gets our award for Top Pick in Lightweight Design; it's made for the thru-hiker, or folks willing to go light to go fast.||The Versant 60 wins our Top Pick for Travel packs as a simple, versatile pack that fits in from the overhead compartment of an airplane to the backcountry.||The Octal 55 is light, simple, and still provides for tons of storage space.||The AirContact Lite is a relatively inexpensive pack with a simple design and a comfortable suspension system that works well under heavy loads.|
|Rating Categories||Osprey Aura AG 65||Osprey Lumina 45||Thule Versant 60||Gregory Octal 55||Aircontact Lite 60+10 SL|
|Ease Of Use (15%)|
|Specs||Osprey Aura AG 65||Osprey Lumina 45||Thule Versant 60||Gregory Octal 55||Aircontact Lite 60+10 SL|
|Measured Weight (pounds) (medium)||4.66 lb||1.86 lb||4.38 lb||2.58 lb||4.1 lb|
|Volumes Available (liters)||65||45, 60||50, 60, 70||45, 55||40+10, 45+10, 50+10, 70+10|
|Organization: Enclosed Compartments||Main compartment, lid, front pocket, side access pockets, dual front access pockets||Main compartment, front pocket & w side pockets, lid||Main compartment, front shove-it pocket, waterproof rolltop pocket, side pockets, hip belt pocket||Main compartment, lid, front shove-it pocket||Main compartment, lid, side pocket, stash pocket|
Best Overall Women's Model
Osprey Aura AG 65
We took our old favorite, the Osprey Aura AG, out on the trails again to make sure it still deserves its Editors' Choice title. Even compared to the newest models we reviewed, the Aura still excels as our favorite all-around pack. The comfort and support it provides are unparalleled — mostly due to its high-tech, supremely breathable suspension system. We also love the feature set this pack provides. Its overall design is sleek and simple, but it still provides plenty of straps and pockets to keep your gear organized. We especially love the large, stretchy mesh outer pocket. It adds tons of external storage space. The hip belt is now collapsible, making this pack much easier to store than previous versions where the rigid hip belt stuck out a few feet.
While the pack can feel bulky and is overkill for lighter loads, the Aura is still our Editors' Choice for everything from simple overnight hikes to month-long thru-hiking adventures.
Read review: Osprey Aura AG 65
Best Bang for the Buck
The North Face Terra 55
These days, it's challenging to find a full-sized backpack that performs well for under $200. Enter the North Face Terra 55. This pack received high scores in almost all of our rating metrics, holding its own among packs that cost twice as much. We appreciate that the Terra's simple design is not cluttered with extra features but still offers ample outer storage with six pockets. The suspension system provides enough support for the pack to remain comfortable on long days, but is nothing too fancy. It's an added bonus that this pack is the least expensive model in this review. The Terra wins our Best Buy award for its combination of simplicity, versatility, and intuitive design.
The Terra's main storage area has a barrier that separates the bottom portion into a sleeping bag compartment. This divide and the pack's smaller size overall limit its carrying capacity. Still, the pack is roomy enough for most backcountry endeavors. The pack is not as adjustable as others, but it works. The North Face Terra is a great, comfortable pack for a reasonable price.
Read review: The North Face Terra 55
Top Pick Award for Travel
Thule Versant 60
A U-shaped zipper access point and spacious interior make the Versant our Top Pick for Travel. This large front zipper adds to the duffel bag vibe and also makes it easy to pack and organize your gear. This backpack is also comfortable and easy to carry. The Versant performs exceptionally well whether it's stuffed with backpacking gear for a few nights or filled with clothes and books for an international adventure. In terms of adjustability, the pack is just as versatile as it gets. It can carry both heavy and lighter loads comfortably. The Versant's sleek suspension system is supportive and comfortable but lacks the bulk of other packs in this review. This makes the Versant easy to fit in trains, planes, and automobiles, and it carries well on, or off, trail in the backcountry.
The removable lid does not work well as a deployable daypack. This is a shame since daypacks are so useful when traveling. The bag's shoulder straps are also minimally padded, which can be uncomfortable after a long day under heavy loads. Still, the travel-friendly benefits add up to make the Thule Versant an excellent option for versatile adventures.
Read review: Thule Versant 60
Top Pick for Ultralight Design
Osprey Lumina 45
We have yet to see a backpack that is as lightweight as the Osprey Lumina 45. It's our Top Pick for Ultralight Design. There are more and more women's specific packs infiltrating the ultralight market, but the Lumina is the best we've seen. At 1.86 pounds, this pack is impressive even by ultralight standards. You may think that such a featherweight pack would lack support, but the Lumina has a full frame and suspension system provided plenty of support without adding weight.
The Lumina has three large, external storage pockets, which provide extra space on the outside of the pack for storage. This is important because the main body is slim, which can make it tough to pack correctly. It's is an advanced model, designed for a specific use. It's better suited for women who are experienced in the backcountry and who are looking to seriously pare down their kit.
Read review: Osprey Lumina 45
Top Pick for Heavy Loads
Deuter Aircontact Lite 60+10 SL - Women's
Our favorite new pack this season is the Deuter AirContact Lite by far. It was a contender for our Editors' Choice award but fell short in a few metrics. That said, we love the AirContact for its streamlined design and ability to carry around 50 pounds without causing pains or strains. We took the pack out of the box, loaded it down with 55 pounds of food and climbing gear and headed straight out the door. The AirContact excelled. It provided tons of support and stability when maneuvering through talus and steep, rocky terrain. The pack worked just as well when nearly empty on day hikes. The removable lid is also large enough to hold our small personal items, which we loved.
The pack is very tall and can feel top heavy, as a result, it might not work well for shorter women. For women of average height or above, this pack's excellent suspension system and carefully considered features make this Deuter model one of our favorites.
Read review: Deuter Aircontact Lite 60+10 SL
Why You Should Trust Us
This review is brought to you by OutdoorGearLab contributor and professional mountain guide Jane Jackson. Jane spends 200+ days a year outside using and testing packs and other gear. She has worked extensively in Alaska, Yosemite, and the Tetons, to name a few locations. She has also taught self-rescue and worked for Exum Mountain Guides. Additionally, her background in outdoor gear sales and rentals make her well-versed in understanding product features and performance.
This review began with a lot of market research to find the best women's packs to test. We looked at hundreds before purchasing the top 16 to compare in the field. We identified 6 key performance areas to focus on and took them out to a variety of locations, like the Wind River Range, John Muir Trail, and Canyonlands. We paid attention to things like how comfortable and easy to use the packs were, as well as their weight, suspension functionality, and available features. We believe the resulting review is comprehensive and a great starting point if you're in the market for a women's backpacking pack.
Analysis and Test Results
We rated each of these backpacks on how comfortably they carry loads, how supportive their suspension is, how easy they are to use, how much they weigh, and how useful their features are. We also paid special attention to what makes these bags women's specific and how they are different from unisex or men's pack. Keep reading to find out all about the top performers.
Why Buy a Women's Pack
All of the packs we evaluated in this review are women's specific. Some of these brands, like Osprey, Mountain Hardwear, The North Face, and Gregory, offer a men's version of the same pack. The notable differences separating men's, unisex, and women's backpacks are weight and sizing.
Women's models are sized and shaped specially for a woman's torso. Often the shoulder straps and back panels are narrower, the hip belts are curved or molded for curvier bodies, and the adjustment options are within the smaller size range of women. A woman's center of gravity is typically lower than a man's, and women's specific designs are intended to optimize load carrying. Women's packs are usually ounces lighter, primarily due to a decreased size. These fit and sizing changes often make a women's specific model more comfortable and better fitting than a men's or unisex model. They also keep the pack weight to body weight ratio in a more appropriate range for smaller bodies. These shifts all make a big difference as you log miles.
Women with larger frames and broader shoulders may prefer men's or unisex models, but most women will find the features of a women's specific pack preferable. With any pack, it is worth spending the time to get the correct size for your body type. For more information see the Sizing and Fit section of our Buying Advice article.
While we only consider performance during product testing and scoring, we know that value matters. While the best performing products win our Editors' Choice or Top Pick awards, our Best Buy awards go to products that offer up the best value, providing high performance at a reasonable price. In this review, The North Face Terra 55 and Gregory Octal 55 offer a high performance to value ratio.
Most packs fall between $230 and $300. There are also outliers on both ends of the spectrum — like the Arc'teryx Bora AR 61, which is an incredibly technical, yet also costly pack. On the other hand, there are packs like the Deuter AirContact Lite, which is a well designed, durable pack for significantly less. The Terra 55 earns our Best Buy Award for its simple design for even less still.
How comfortable is this pack when nearly empty? When fully loaded? Are there contact points that lead to discomfort, chaffing, or bruising? How do we feel after a long day with this pack on our pack? These are some of the questions we posed while testing. These backpacks are meant for multi-day use, and adequate comfort is essential unless you are mainly interested in fast-packing or ultra-lightweight hiking. Fast and light backpackers often have to sacrifice a degree of comfort and spaciousness for the sake of covering more ground more quickly.
The most comfortable pack in the fleet is the Arc'teryx Bora AR 61. We especially like its comfy waistband. The Bora combines s sleek and straightforward design with tons of comfort in a way that surpasses other packs in this review.
To get these scores, we evaluated the overall cushion and support of each backpack. Padding on both the shoulder straps and the hip belt are essential to help you avoid chaffing and enjoy all-day comfort. Some models, like the two Osprey packs and the Gregory Deva 60, have great padding, while others, like the REI Co-op Traverse 65 and The North Face Banchee, are designed to be lightweight and simple. They don't offer as much padding. We also considered the width of the shoulder straps, along with their thickness. Packs with thinner shoulder straps, like the Thule Versant 60, may be more comfortable for those with narrower shoulders, while wide straps can be more suitable for those with an athletic build.
Back panels, further discussed in the suspension section, do a lot to contribute to overall comfort. Some back panels are so soft that they are comfortable even against the skin, others use firm padding to maintain rigidity, stability, and support. Mesh back panels allow airflow and let your back breathe. Having a puddle of sweat held against your back isn't comfortable. A well ventilated back panel, like the one on the Aura AG, is incredibly comfy because the pack itself doesn't rest on your back. You can wear this pack in any season and with any clothing. Some models, like The North Face Terra or the Deuter ACT Lite have straightforward back panels that use their rigidity for added support.
Keep in mind that packs are designed around ideal weight loads. While most are capable of comfortably carrying an array of weights, some work with a broader range than others. Generally speaking, the lighter the pack is, the more comfortably it carries light loads, and the heavier it is, the more comfortably it carries heavy loads. There are obvious exceptions, but this will give you an idea of how well a model will handle your gear.
The Osprey Aura AG 65 is the most versatile pack in our test when it comes to weight loads. This contender can be used as a daypack or for a single night trip, carrying only lunch, a water filter, and extra layers. Or it can comfortably carry a massive multi-day load. In contrast, the Lowe Alpine Manaslu works best with larger loads. It is very stable, has adequate padding, and offers a generous amount of packing space. The Gregory Deva 60 works best for heavier loads due to its size. The pack is relatively bulky, and with a small load, it can feel sloppy and excessive.
A pack's suspension system distributes weight across your back, from your shoulders to your hips and relates directly to the pack's frame. The Osprey Aura AG has an excellent suspension system that distributes weight evenly, lending itself to very comfortable hiking and load carrying, especially for longer days. The Anti-Gravity design is our favorite feature on any competitor and is a large part of why this model won our Editors' Choice award.
The Deuter AirContact Lite provides lots of lower back support. This pack has extra padding in the lower back, just above the waist belt, which we find very helpful when carrying heavy loads. Some companies now use hinging suspension systems that allow the hip belt and the shoulder straps to move independently. This helps keep your load stay stable and allows the pack to move with you as you hike or climb over obstacles. Please note that a proper fit is necessary for the hinging design to function correctly. These newer systems are very stable and evenly distribute your load, though they add weight to the pack.
The Arc'teryx Bora AR has one of these systems, which hinges at the lower back. It moves with your hips while stabilizing the pack on the shoulders. We love its simple, yet supportive design. The Gregory Deva 60 also has a decentralized system called the Response Auto Fit Suspension, which rotates independently on the waist belt. Unfortunately, it doesn't pivot as smoothly as the Bora and its hip belt is uncomfortably stiff. These flaws limit the design's effectiveness.
Another important suspension element to consider is back panel design. This part of the pack rests directly against your back and is an essential aspect of comfort. Most of the models we tested are designed to allow airflow between the hiker's back and the pack. This is accomplished using a curved frame design that rests against your shoulder blades and hips while opposing the natural curve of your back in between. Look toward the Osprey Lumina or the Gregory Octal for examples of this style back panel.
The Osprey packs have elaborate airflow designs that significantly reduce the sweat that forms on the back during a full day of hard hiking. Anti-Gravity (AG) is a highlight of the Aura AG and Ariel AG packs. It features a tightly suspended mesh back panel that is inches away from the back of the main compartment. This creates unparalleled ventilation and comfort. The space between the body and the main compartment doesn't compromise any stability except with cumbersome pack loads. (The closer the pack is to the body, the better it will contribute to stability under heavy weight.) This is why models that are intended for larger carrying capacities rest tightly against the back, incorporating ventilation into the padding itself. A good example is the Deuter AirContact Lite.
First, we weighed each of these packs in-house. Then, throughout this review, we packed each model with very similar kits each time we headed out for a test trip. For a multi-day trip, we packed a sleeping bag, a two-person tent, a couple of changes of clothes, rain gear, water, a bear canister with food, and few miscellaneous items. Since we were carrying nearly the same gear weight on every trip, we could pay attention to the packs' weight.
This review includes a ton of very lightweight models that blow the rest of the packs out of the water. The Osprey Lumina 45 is by far the lightest, weighing only 1.86 pounds. Next is the Gregory Octal 55 and the Osprey Eja 58, which weigh 2.58 and 2.6 pounds respectively. We love these lighter models, though they do sacrifice some comfort and trim some favorite features to make this possible. Weight is a trade-off. The difference between a 5-pound pack, like the Manaslu and a 2.5-pound model, like the Gregory Octal means automatically carrying an extra three pounds every day on the trail.
That said, heavier packs often provide more support — that's the case with the Deuter AirContact Lite, which weighs four pounds. This pack offers substantial support for heavy loads but keeps its weight reasonable by cutting features and keeping its design simple. The Lowe Alpine Mansalu, Osprey Ariel 65, and Gregory Deva 60 are the heaviest packs in this review, weighing over five pounds. Most models fall in the 4-pound range. Some contenders, like the Arc'teryx Bora AR 61, feel much lighter than they appear on the scale due to the overall simplicity of their design.
When looking at pack weight, consider how much you'll be carrying. Are you someone who likes to bring a lot? Is this pack going to be used for backcountry climbing missions? Or, are you excited to cut weight and slim down your kit? You can look to our How to Choose a Women's Backpack article for more details on how weight should play a factor in your decision.
Ease of Use
The ease of use rating assesses how simple each model is to adjust, pack, access, and personally configure to maximize enjoyment, comfort, and space. Plainly said, how easy is this pack to live with, day in and day out? We also consider how adjustable each pack is to your specific build. The better the pack fits your body, the more comfortable and enjoyable the overall experience will be! Few things can be worse than finding yourself thirty miles in the backcountry, unsure of how to use your pack.
Most packs follow the same basic design principles, so they all tend to do well here. That said, nuances make some models stand out. The Thule Versant received our highest score in this metric for its design that includes an easy to remove lid, a sizeable U-Shaped zipper for quick internal access, and a simple feature set that does not complicate the outside of the pack. The Osprey Aura AG and Osprey Ariel Pro also rate well due to user-friendly adjustments, multiple access points, sleeping bag compartments, and few if any, excessive design features.
Packs that receive low ratings in this metric are the Osprey Ariel 65 and the Lowe Alpine Manaslu. We found them overly complicated and excessive in their feature set. Both Gregory packs — the Deva and the Jade received average scores in this metric, since they are easy to adjust, but felt excessive in terms of external pockets and straps.
The competitors with the easiest and most intuitive suspension system adjustment points include the Thule Versant, the Arc'teryx Bora AR 61, and the Osprey Aura. Others, like the Mountain Hardwear Ozonic Outdry 60 and the Lowe Alpine Manaslu are less intuitive and take some fiddling to make the proper adjustments.
To compare feature sets, we examined the size, shape, location, and number of pockets, the number and quality of buckles, the number and placement of straps, and the lid design. By utilizing (or in some cases, not utilizing) the unique organizational designs of these contenders, we found that simplicity is great and lightens the pack, but having the ability to separate gear is also an advantage for efficiency.
Organization strategies range from super simplistic with the Arc'teryx Bora AR 61, the Thule Versant, and the Deuter AirContact Lite to very complex with the Osprey Ariel 65, Gregory Deva and Lowe Alpine Manaslu. The latter three packs have more than five enclosed compartments and additional open pockets. The Editors' Choice award winner, the Osprey Aura AG, has five pockets: two medium and two small pockets, in addition to the main compartment.
While it does come down to preference, simple pack designs are more pleasant to use over time. After fiddling around with dozens and dozens of models, our testers have come to realize that they prefer designs with fewer pockets and straps in general. New packs like the Deuter AirContact Lite and the Gregory Octal are slimming down on features, suggesting that the market is headed toward more straightforward models overall.
Except for the waterproof Mountain Hardwear Ozonic 60, which can withstand hours of pouring rain, the packs we reviewed are water-resistant at best. If you're out in a downpour, your gear is going to get wet. Use a garbage bag to get through bad weather in a pinch. If you're planning on an extended trip in wet weather, consider purchasing a rain cover fitted for your pack. Here are a few options:
Having the right pack on your back can make the difference between an enjoyable time in the outdoors and a great deal of annoyance. Choosing the right pack, however, can be pretty tough. Your personal needs will vary depending on the environment and climate where you spend your time, as well as your packing habits and body type. And while we can generally agree that we need a pack that will perform well on our outdoor excursions, we tend to prefer products that won't drain our bank accounts as well. We hope that this review will provide valuable insight as you search through the marketplace.
— Jane Jackson